Richard III Part 2. The Battle of Bosworth Field.

BOSWORTH FIELD 

Bosworth Field was a hugely important part of British history, it was the start of the Tudor dynasty. Everybody has heard of the Tudors, most famously Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. However, it was Richard III defeat at the Battle of Bosworth Field that gave them the throne. 

It was Richard III who had just assented the throne, by questionable means, that was killed at Bosworth leaving the way open for Henry VII to take the crown. This was the start of the Tudors, but lets step back alittle and learn abit about how the Battle of Bosworth came to be. 

The Battle of Boswoth happened on the 22nd August 1485, this was the last battle in the War Of The Roses and the end of the Plantagenet dynasty. It was faught between the House of York and the House of Lancaster for control of the English throne. This is an all to familiar story during medieval history, power struggles and war. The Battle of Bosworth Field took place near Market Bosworth in Leicestershire, England. 

Now lets go back a little further, after the Battle of Tewkesbury in 1471, where the Yorkists had been victorius, Henry Tudor who at the time was only fourteen had fled to France although were blown off course and landed in Brittany. He was offered asylum, but in reality Duke Francis II of Brittany realised the political value in keeping them in Brittany. Henry was the Lancastrian claimant to the throne and of great importance to the Lancastrian loyalists. Due to the political turmoil and danger to his life, he along with his uncle  Jasper Tudor were sent into exile. They later travelled to France, still in exile from England. Henry was in exile for around fourteen years until he returned in 1485, at this time Richard was on the throne and was possibly not popular, making it the perfect time for Henry to return. 

Richard's rule was associated with fear and suspicion and many nobles distrusted him, possibly believing that he had a part in the prince's disappearance. 

Henry Stafford

Public Domain.

BUCKINGHAMS REBELLION.

Henry Stafford 2nd Duke of Buckingham`s rebellion happened in October 1483, the rebellion ultimately failed but did weaken an already weak Richard. 

Led by Buckingham who was once an ally of Richard, the rebellion aimed to restore Edward V, whom Richard had deposed. Buckingham, disillusioned with Richard’s rule, allied with the exiled Henry Tudor and his mother, Margaret Beaufort. Support came from Edward IV loyalists and Yorkists. Meanwhile, Henry attempted to invade from Brittany with over 500 soldiers. A storm thwarted the landing, Henry’s fleet had been scattered by bad weather while at sea, leaving only two ships, one of them his own, anchored in Plymouth Sound. As he prepared to set sail and join the rebellion he got word of the

developments in England. A premature revolt in Kent had alerted Richard to the rebellion and caused it to collapse before Buckingham could fully act. The tide had turned against the uprising. These events are detailed in the Croyland Chronicle.

The Croyland Chronicle, from the Benedictine Abbey of Croyland, is a key source for late 15th-century English history. Once linked to Abbot Ingulf, parts were later deemed forgeries. Its reliability is debated due to unknown authorship, textual gaps, and limited efforts to recover or translate the original manuscript.

Richard had Buckingham executed for the treason on the 2nd November 1483. 

Was Buckingham involved in the disappearance of the princes?

Some historians suggest Henry Stafford may have murdered the Princes in the Tower, possibly without Richard III's knowledge. A Portuguese document and one from the College of Arms accuses Buckingham. However, many historians doubt that he acted alone, as access to the princes required Richard's approval. Richard’s failure to blame Buckingham after his execution weakens the theory. Though some suggest Buckingham had ambitions for the throne, most agree he wouldn’t have dared act without Richard’s consent or at least his knowledge. Others theorise that Henry Stafford became aware of Richards involvement in the Princes disappearance and that is what inspired him to rebel. We will never know!

Henry Tudors return.

Henry Tudor

Public Domain

Henry had perhaps the least right to the throne of any 15th century King, descending from an illegitimate liaison. However, on the 7th August 1485, 28-year-old Henry Tudor landed at Mill Bay, at the mouth of the Milford Haven waterway. Accompanied by around 2,000 French mercenaries funded by the French king, Charles VIII,  Henry launched his campaign to claim the English throne.

Henry chose Mill Bay for several strategic reasons. Familiarity was one: he was born at Pembroke Castle, just across the water, and his uncle, Jasper Tudor the Earl of Pembroke, had kept in contact with local allies during their time in France. This local knowledge likely helped secure early support.

Another key reason was secrecy. Mill Bay was a secluded spot, helping Henry avoid detection by royal observers stationed at Dale Castle, only 3km away. Though news of the landing reached King Richard by the 11th August, the initial arrival went unchallenged, giving Henry’s small army the chance to organize without interference. The decision to land at Mill Bay proved crucial to the success of Henry’s campaign and his rise to the throne.

THE BATTLE OF BOSWORTH FIELD 

Henry Tudors landing on the southwest coast of Wales on the 7th August 1485 and march inland, gained support en route to London. King Richard III quickly and confidently assembled his army and met Henry near Ambion Hill, close to Market Bosworth. Lord Stanley and Sir William Stanley arrived with troops but held back, initially offering Henry only four knights, including Sir John Savage, who led Henry’s left flank. Richard divided his substantially larger army into three groups under the Duke of Norfolk and the Earl of Northumberland. Norfolk’s troops faltered against the Earl of Oxford’s forces, and Northumberland failed to assist him. In a last gamble, Richard led a direct charge to kill Henry but was intercepted and killed by William Stanley’s forces. The Battle ended in a victory for Henry Tudor. 

Henry was crowned King Henry VII, founding the Tudor dynasty which would reshape British history. He commissioned favourable accounts of the battle, marking the start of the Tudor dynasty and a symbolic end to the Middle Ages.

As always history is always told through the eyes of the victor's. So Richard's defeat and Henry's accounts of the battle have strongly influenced our opinion of Richard III. Shakespeare’s portrayal also being somewhat propaganda of the time.  

What is your opinion of Richard III? 

Please comment below.

The exact battlefield location remains disputed.

Richard III Part One. Ruthless Usurper or Misunderstood?

Richard III: Overview.

Richard III: A Controversial King

Public Domain.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:King_Richard_III_cropped.png

Richard III was the last Plantagenet king of England and ruled for just over two years from 1483 until his death at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. His reign, though brief, left an enduring legacy that has sparked debate for centuries. Richard was born on the 2nd of October 1452, at Fotheringhay Castle in Northamptonshire. He was the youngest son of Richard, Duke of York, and Cecily Neville an English noblewoman. He played a significant role in the Wars of the Roses, a series of conflicts between the rival houses of Lancaster and York for control of the English throne. York was represented by a white rose and a red rose represented the house of Lancaster. 

king Edward IV.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edward_IV,_Father_of_Elizabeth_of_York.jpg

Public Domain.

                                                                                                                                                                               

After the death of his brother, King Edward IV, in 1483, Richard was appointed Lord Protector for Edward’s young son, Edward V. However, amid claims of illegitimacy against Edward’s children, Richard took the throne himself. Edward V and his younger brother, Richard, Duke of York, were confined to the Tower of London, where they mysteriously disappeared in 1483. Their fate remains one of the greatest mysteries in English history, and many have accused Richard of orchestrating their deaths to secure his claim. What do you think? Did he have the two boys murdered? 

The Princes in the Tower.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Princes_in_the_Tower_by_John_Everett_Millais_(1878).png

Public Domain.

This question has been asked by many historians over the years. The mystery and questioning only increased on 17th July 1674 when workmen discovered two skeletons hidden at the tower. Many beleived they were the princes aged only twelve and nine at the time of their disappearance. The 1400s were a very grusome time, and monarchy was built on murder and deceipt. There is a strong possiblity that the remains are those of the two boys and that their uncle who was supposed to be their protector had them murdered (because he would not get his hands dirty himself).  He knew he was next in line after the two boys, he knew they were vulnerable after their fathers death, but did he? I`m leaning towards a yes, based on all the circumstantial evidence, but will we ever know definitively? I doubt it. 

His reputation was overshadowed by allegations of treachery and murder, and William Shakespeare’s play Richard III immortalized him as a villainous, power-hungry monarch, further cementing his negative image. He was portrayed and a hunchback and the discovery of his burial place in Leicester has proved that yes he suffered with a curvature of the spine, it was in no way as extreme a that described and played out in the theatre. This is yet another way in which his reputation has been tarnished. this does make me wonder if our belief in him as the person behind the missing princes has been, in many ways influenced.

Richard’s reign was marked by both progressive reforms and brutal power struggles. He implemented legal reforms aimed at improving the fairness of the justice system particularly for the poor and he made efforts to protect the rights of the common people. He also established the first council in the north in 1484, to improve access to justice. Richard had strong support from northern nobles, where he spent much of his earlier life as Duke of Gloucester. You could say he attempted to bridge the North, South divide, something politicians are still trying to accomplish today.

In 1485, Richard faced a formidable challenge from Henry Tudor, a Lancastrian claimant to the throne. Their armies clashed at the Battle of Bosworth Field, where Richard was killed, marking the end of the Plantagenet dynasty and the beginning of the Tudor era. His death ushered in Henry VII’s reign, which brought relative stability to England after decades of civil war. I will be going in to more detail about the Battle of Boswoth in my next blog.

For centuries, Richard III’s reputation was marred by propaganda from the victorious Tudors. However, recent discoveries, including the 2012 unearthing of his remains in a Leicester car park, have prompted a reevaluation of his legacy. Modern historians continue to debate whether Richard was a ruthless usurper or a capable ruler whose image was distorted by his enemies, or could it be that he was infact both. Being a capable king doesn`t negate his ability to be ruthless.  Regardless of the controversy, Richard III remains one of England’s most fascinating and enigmatic monarchs.

Share your views below. 

Attribution: Andrewrabbott.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Memorial_to_King_Richard_III_of_England_in_Leicester_Cathedral.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

Bletchley Park post war.. Episode 5.

After the war Bletchley Park was no longer needed as a code-breaking hub and in 1946 became home to a variety of training schools including for teachers, Post Office workers, air traffic control engineers, and members of GCHQ. Bletchley Park closed in 1987.

There were plans for a housing development on the site which would have demolished this hugely important piece of history. luckily, in 1991 the Bletchley Archaeological and Historical Society started a campaignnto save Bletchley Park and thanks to their efforts Milton Keynes Council declared most of Bletchley Park a conservation area in 1992. in 1994 Bletchley Park opened as a museum, which makes sure this incredible place and the remarkable people who worked their are remembered and honoured for their massive contribution in the success of the war. 

In 2009, Bletchley Park won a Heritage Lottery Fund grant and was able to invest in the museum and allowing for more restoration and expansion. over 250,000 people visit Bletchley Park every year, and it is constantly growing and improving what it can offer to the public. 

Please consider visitng this remarkable place, it is truely amazing.